![]() If you study film photography closely it quite often doesn’t appear as sharp as modern digital photography. Grain was present in most film photography and adding it will instantly bring out the film-like effect. Early Kodachrome film also appeared warm and some colours faded easily. When I make my presets I’ll be flattening both the highlights and the shadows for a vintage effect. When using film your whites will never clip, no matter how hard you push them. I’m going to generalise a little bit here and say that the colour film look is commonly lower in contrast than what modern digital cameras are capable of producing. A very simplified analysis is that the earlier film photographs have a faded appearance with fewer details in the shadows and highlights and that later film prints had more colour and contrast. Having said that I also love the saturated colours of the 1990s and the 2000s from photographers such as Philip-Lorca diCorcia. I appreciate the black and white faded look from the 1930s. ![]() The images that appeal to me appear a little faded and warm. Look at the overall high dynamic range - are the images high in contrast or faded? When you study images look at colour - is it saturated, desaturated or tinted with a specific hue? Another thing to look at is the overall colour balance - are the images cool or warm? Sometimes the highlights are warm and the shadows are cool. My personal favourites are nostalgic images from the 70s and 80s, but I also love the early black-and-white prints from the 1930s. I think a great way to learn what it is that you love about the film look is by studying photographs shot using it, particularly from the 20th Century.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |